Search for: "Cavazos v. Stephens"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2011, 3:13 am
Any appellate court decision that begins with a scene from Twelve Angry Men, and Stephen Reinhardt's opinion from the 9th Circuit in Williams v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
WALGREEN COMPANY; from Harris County; 14th district (14-06-00962-CV, 243 SW3d 183, 10-11-07) [Dissenting opinion in 14-06-00962-CV]08-0212THE ESTATE OF STEPHEN ELLIS ALEXANDER; from McLennan County; 10th district (10-06-00360-CV, 250 SW3d 461, 01-30-08)08-0242UNITED PLAZA-MIDLAND L.L.C. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am
Last Friday, Stephen Wermiel discussed the constitutional issues in Miller v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 8:42 am
It is not a rarity, of course, for the Court to second-guess the Ninth Circuit, but the case of Cavazos v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am
’” However, Justice Stephens agreed with the majority result because she believed that the impermissible cross-examination that occurred in this case was harmless error. [read post]
